40 years later Hollywood releases a remake. Predictable, for box office appeal, they change the location to the United States but other than that it's pretty much a shot for shot and line for line remake. That's not to say it's just as good. The two leads James Marsden and Kate Bosworth lack the acting ability of the original couple. The bad guys in these do a decent enough job and those of you who are familiar with USA TV shows will recognise a few faces. The biggest let down with them is surprisingly, James Woods character. Woods is normally an actor I like but he lacked the conviction and leadership that was show by his English counterpart (Peter Vaughan) in Peckinpah's film.
I imagine most of these comparisons are immaterial as I would say 90% of the target audience haven't heard of, never mind seen the original and with no doubt in a few years time it will be lost with the other Hollywood copycats.
Yeah, I haven't seen this, but that's what I figured it might be like. You say that Woods lacks conviction; could that be because so does the film?
ReplyDeleteThat really only partially to blame, I think but the other 'villains' in the film didn't seem to have suffered as much. Tom Hedden despite being a drunk seems a much more powerful and fear inspiring character - I just don't believe that 'Coach' to be able to goat people into action. Perhaps, I'm am under estimating his old students loyalty to him but for me it didn't seem believably.
ReplyDelete